![]() ![]() In that benchmark, the M1 Max scored a 1,749 in the single-core test and 11,542 on the multi-core. Just a few days ago, we reported on early Geekbench scores for the M1 Max. These aren’t the only benchmarks that bear out the performance of the M1 Max. The M1 Max doesn’t win on every benchmark such as the Car Chase and the Aztec Ruins High Tier, but the fact that it’s even keeping up at all with desktop components is a game changer. The M1 Max appears more powerful than several desktop graphics cards, including the RTX 2080 Super, Radeon RX 6800 XT, and even the Nvidia Titan V. That said, comparing M1 Max results to the RTX 3080 Mobile and Radeon RX 6800M (the same GPUs that Apple used in its presentation) sees the Apple Silicon either beating or coming within striking distance of the other two GPUs when looking at the offscreen results.Ĭomparing the Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen results to other GPUs is pretty mind-blowing. First, the submission on GFXBench was made utilizing Apple’s Metal API, compared to the Nvidia and AMD results using OpenGL on Windows. Obviously, it would be wise to be skeptical of these results for a couple of reasons. Reddit user senttoschool posted the first M1 Max GFXBench scores in the r/Hardware subreddit. ![]() ![]() This puts it in line with Apple’s charts from its presentation. This time, a Redditor found GFXBench scores for the M1 Max that place it at around 25% faster than the mobile Nvidia RTX 3070. Fitbit Versa 3Īpple’s big claims about the performance capabilities of the M1 Pro and M1 Max seem to be legitimate as more benchmarks surface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |